<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fight the Obesity Epidemic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foe.org.nz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foe.org.nz</link>
	<description>Stop our children developing type 2 diabetes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obesity news 133</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/07/23/obesity-news-133/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/07/23/obesity-news-133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obesity News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obesity News is FOE’s regular round-up of obesity-prevention news from around the world.
Read  the latest issue: (18 July 2010)
Read earlier issues  of Obesity News
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obesity News is FOE’s regular round-up of obesity-prevention news from around the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://foe.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/wp-publications-archive/openfile.php?action=open&#038;file=146">Read  the latest issue</a>: (18 July 2010)</p>
<p><a href="http://foe.org.nz/category/obesity-news/">Read earlier issues  of Obesity News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/07/23/obesity-news-133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obesity News 132</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/30/obesity-news-132/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/30/obesity-news-132/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obesity News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obesity News is FOE’s regular round-up of obesity-prevention news  from around  the world.
Read  the latest issue: (28 June 2010)
Read earlier issues  of Obesity News
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obesity News is FOE’s regular round-up of obesity-prevention news  from around  the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://foe.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/wp-publications-archive/openfile.php?action=open&#038;file=145">Read  the latest issue</a>: (28 June 2010)</p>
<p><a href="http://foe.org.nz/category/obesity-news/">Read earlier issues  of Obesity News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/30/obesity-news-132/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US: McDonald&#8217;s threatened with lawsuit over kids happy meal toys</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/23/us-mcdonalds-threatened-with-lawsuit-over-kids-happy-meal-toys/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/23/us-mcdonalds-threatened-with-lawsuit-over-kids-happy-meal-toys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A US nutrition watchdog group says it will sue McDonald&#8217;s if the fast-food chain continues to use toys  to promote Happy Meals. The Center for Science in the Public Interest says using toys to promote &#8220;happy meals&#8221; is unfair, deceptive and illegal.
Read more about the threatened lawsuit: CSPI, 22 June 2010
Do McDonald&#8217;s toys lure children?
TVNZ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A US nutrition watchdog group says it will sue McDonald&#8217;s if the fast-food chain continues to use toys  to promote Happy Meals. The Center for Science in the Public Interest says using toys to promote &#8220;happy meals&#8221; is unfair, deceptive and illegal.</p>
<p><a href="http://cspinet.org/new/201006221.html">Read more about the threatened lawsuit</a>: CSPI, 22 June 2010</p>
<p><strong>Do McDonald&#8217;s toys lure children?</strong></p>
<p>TVNZ ran the story about McDonald&#8217;s Happy Meal toys.</p>
<p>They looked at the nutritional content of a happy meal then interviewed a nutritionist.  She  suggested toys should only come with healthier happy meal options.  FOE’s Dr Robyn Toomath also commented.</p>
<p><a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/do-mcdonald-s-toys-lure-children-3606789">Read more about McDonald&#8217;s toys luring children</a>: TVNZ news, 23 June 2010</p>
<p><a href="http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/do-mcdonald-s-toys-lure-children-3606789/video">Watch the TVNZ video</a> (1.52 min)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/23/us-mcdonalds-threatened-with-lawsuit-over-kids-happy-meal-toys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US: Cartoon characters attract kids to junk food &#8211; study</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/21/us-cartoon-characters-attract-kids-to-junk-food-study-2/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/21/us-cartoon-characters-attract-kids-to-junk-food-study-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular, licensed cartoon characters are more likely to appear on junk food than on healthy food, according to a new study.
When given a choice between a package decorated with a cartoon celebrity, and identical food in a plain wrapper, most kids picked the food from the cartoon-adorned package as a snack.
Read more about cartoon characters [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popular, licensed cartoon characters are more likely to appear on junk food than on healthy food, according to a new study.</p>
<p>When given a choice between a package decorated with a cartoon celebrity, and identical food in a plain wrapper, most kids picked the food from the cartoon-adorned package as a snack.</p>
<p><a href="http://wellness.blogs.time.com/2010/06/21/are-cartoon-characters-coaxing-kids-to-eat-junk-food">Read more about cartoon characters coaxing kids to eat junk food</a>: Time</p>
<p><a href="http://opa.yale.edu/news/article.aspx?id=7630">Read the press release</a> from Yale University, 21 June 2010</p>
<p><a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/peds.2009-3433v1">Read  the abstract</a>: Pediatrics, 21 June 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/21/us-cartoon-characters-attract-kids-to-junk-food-study-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK: The lobbying campaign that won the food labelling battle</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/19/uk-the-lobbying-campaign-that-won-the-food-labelling-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/19/uk-the-lobbying-campaign-that-won-the-food-labelling-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic light labels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lobbying carried out by food manufacturers to block a European-wide food labelling system backed by doctors is “laid bare” in a series of private emails published by The Independent.
Read more about Big Food&#8217;s lobbying campaign,  18 June 2010﻿
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lobbying carried out by food manufacturers to block a European-wide food labelling system backed by doctors is “laid bare” in a series of private emails published by The Independent.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/news/laid-bare-the-lobbying-campaign-that-won-the-food-labelling-battle-2003686.html">Read more about Big Food&#8217;s lobbying campaign, </a> 18 June 2010﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/19/uk-the-lobbying-campaign-that-won-the-food-labelling-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia: Business as usual for food marketers</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/19/australia-business-as-usual-for-food-marketers/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/19/australia-business-as-usual-for-food-marketers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advertising and marketing industries have breathed a sigh of relief  after the Australian federal government decided against a  big crackdown on food  and alcohol marketing.
Public health advocates vow the fight is far  from over.
Read more about business as usual for food marketers: SMH, 18 June 2010
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advertising and marketing industries have breathed a sigh of relief  after the Australian federal government decided against a  big crackdown on food  and alcohol marketing.</p>
<p>Public health advocates vow the fight is far  from over.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/business-as-usual-for-food-and-alcohol-marketers-20100617-yjy1.html">Read more about business as usual for food marketers</a>: SMH, 18 June 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/19/australia-business-as-usual-for-food-marketers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia: Why is Australia dragging the chain on getting us moving?</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/18/australia-why-is-australia-dragging-the-chain-on-getting-us-moving/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/18/australia-why-is-australia-dragging-the-chain-on-getting-us-moving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With so much evidence showing the wide-ranging benefits of physical activity, why isn’t Australia doing much more to promote active transport?
Read more about promoting active transport: Croakey, the Crikey health blog, 18 June 2010
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With so much evidence showing the wide-ranging benefits of physical activity, why isn’t Australia doing much more to promote active transport?</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/06/18/why-is-australia-dragging-the-chain-in-getting-us-moving/#more-2409">Read more about promoting active transport</a>: Croakey, the Crikey health blog, 18 June 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/18/australia-why-is-australia-dragging-the-chain-on-getting-us-moving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe: EU Parliament rejects &#8216;traffic light&#8217; food labelling</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/17/europe-eu-parliament-rejects-traffic-light-food-labelling/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/17/europe-eu-parliament-rejects-traffic-light-food-labelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic light labels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Union parliament has voted against a &#8220;traffic light&#8221; food labelling scheme for packaged foods and soft drinks.
If passed, food labels would have had red, amber or green colour codes showing the relative amounts of salt, sugar and fat they contain.
A campaign group, The Corporate Europe Observatory, said the food and drink industry had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European Union parliament has voted against a &#8220;traffic light&#8221; food labelling scheme for packaged foods and soft drinks.</p>
<p>If passed, food labels would have had red, amber or green colour codes showing the relative amounts of salt, sugar and fat they contain.</p>
<p>A campaign group, The Corporate Europe Observatory, said the food and drink industry had spent over 1 billion euros opposing the traffic light system.</p>
<p>Consumer groups argue that &#8216;traffic lights&#8217; are easier for shoppers to understand than existing labels.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE65F2AR20100616">Read more about the EU Parliament rejecting &#8216;traffic light&#8217; food labels</a>, Reuters, 16 June 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/17/europe-eu-parliament-rejects-traffic-light-food-labelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ: &#8216;Traffic lights&#8217; on food labels proposed</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/16/nz-traffic-lights-on-food-labels-proposed/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/16/nz-traffic-lights-on-food-labels-proposed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Zealand news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic light labels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canterbury DHB’s submission to the food labelling review calls for a traffic-light label on food indicating how often it should be eaten.
“Green would identify the food as healthy and therefore should be eaten often, amber as less healthy so eaten sometimes and red the least healthy so eaten only occasionally.”
Read the article in The Press/Stuff, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canterbury DHB’s submission to the food labelling review calls for a traffic-light label on food indicating how often it should be eaten.</p>
<p>“Green would identify the food as healthy and therefore should be eaten often, amber as less healthy so eaten sometimes and red the least healthy so eaten only occasionally.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/3815963/Food-traffic-lights-proposed">Read the article in The Press</a>/Stuff, 16 June 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/16/nz-traffic-lights-on-food-labels-proposed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obesity news 131</title>
		<link>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/15/obesity-news-131/</link>
		<comments>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/15/obesity-news-131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obesity News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foe.org.nz/?p=5337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obesity News is FOE’s regular round-up of obesity-prevention news from around  the world.
Read the latest issue: (13 June 2010)
Read earlier issues of Obesity News
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obesity News is FOE’s regular round-up of obesity-prevention news from around  the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://foe.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/wp-publications-archive/openfile.php?action=open&#038;file=143">Read the latest issue</a>: (13 June 2010)</p>
<p><a href="http://foe.org.nz/category/obesity-news/">Read earlier issues of Obesity News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foe.org.nz/2010/06/15/obesity-news-131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
